Master of Healthcare Administration (MHA) Student Outcome Data

Graduate Program in Healthcare Administration Program Data - Fall 2025

Overall Student Retention Rate since Program Launch in 2013: 81%

Graduation Completion Rates

Our students’ progress at their own rate through the program, so calculating completion rates we take graduated students and those students still on track to graduate. The table below represents graduated and on track to graduate for each year

Admission Year Students Enrolled Students Graduated Students Still on track to Graduate Anticipated Completion Rate
Admission Year
2018
Students Enrolled
33
Students Graduated
27
Students Still on track to Graduate
0
Anticipated Completion Rate
27/33 = 82%
Admission Year
2019
Students Enrolled
28
Students Graduated
21
Students Still on track to Graduate
1
Anticipated Completion Rate
22/28 = 79%
Admission Year
2020
Students Enrolled
26
Students Graduated
20
Students Still on track to Graduate
3
Anticipated Completion Rate
23/26 = 88%
Admission Year
2021
Students Enrolled
17
Students Graduated
14
Students Still on track to Graduate
0
Anticipated Completion Rate
14/17 = 82%
Admission Year
2022
Students Enrolled
19
Students Graduated
4
Students Still on track to Graduate
10
Anticipated Completion Rate
14/19 = 74%
Admission Year
2023
Students Enrolled
15
Students Graduated
7
Students Still on track to Graduate
4
Anticipated Completion Rate
11/15 = 73%
Admission Year
2024
Students Enrolled
24
Students Graduated
0
Students Still on track to Graduate
21
Anticipated Completion Rate
21/24 = 88%
Admission Year
2025
Students Enrolled
23
Students Graduated
0
Students Still on track to Graduate
22
Anticipated Completion Rate
22/23 = 96%

*Most students take 7-8 semesters to graduate progressing at part time (2 courses per semester).

Information from Fall 2025 Alumni (n 8)
*Total graduates 2024-2025 were 17

*Data taken from alumni students who graduated in Summer 2024, Fall 2024, and Spring 2025 collected in Summer of 2025. Current student data represents a portion of enrolled students in Fall 2024 and Spring 2025.

Where are students working post-graduation (alumni)?

  • Hospital or Health System - 41%
  • Employed outside of healthcare - 12%
  • Federally Qualified Health Center - 6%
  • Governmental Agencies (e.g., local, state, & federal agencies) - 6%
  • Long-term care Facility - 6%
  • Insurance/HMO - 6%
  • Information Technology/Analytics - 6%
  • Pharmaceutical/Biotech/Medical Device Company - 6%
  • Post Graduate Fellowship - 6%
  • Not currently working - 6%

Type of positions that our graduates hold post-graduation (alumni):

  • Executive Officer - 14% (e.g. CEO, President, Chief Medical Officer, Chief Information Officer, Chief Nursing Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Director, Partner, Owner, etc.).
  • Management Staff - 86% (e.g. Director, Manager, Unit Administrator, Practice Manager, Supervisor, etc.)

Experience working (alumni):

  • Years of experience:
    • Average Experience: 8.85 years
    • Range of Experience: 5-16 years

Average Time to complete the program in semesters (alumni):

  • Average Time: 8.18 semesters
  • Range of Time: 4-15 semesters

Characteristics of students (alumni):

  • Gender:
    • 87% Female
    • 13% male
  • Age:
    • Age mean: 31.13
    • Age range: 25-40
  • Race:
    • 75% White
    • 25% American Indian or Alaska Native
  • Ethnicity:
    • 0% Hispanic or Latino
    • 100% Not Hispanic or Latino

Job Placement of Alumni Surveyed:

  • 100% had a job working in healthcare or non-healthcare related field within 3 months of graduating.
    • 75% had a job working in healthcare related field within 3 months of graduating.
    • 25% had had a job working in non-healthcare related field within 3 months of graduating.
  • 100% had a job working in healthcare or non-healthcare related field within 1 year of graduating.
    • 100% had a job working in healthcare related field within 1 year of graduating.
    • 25% had a job working in non-healthcare related field within 1 year of graduating.
  • 56% maintained current position.
  • 22% had job change within the same organization.
  • 22% experienced a pay raise post-graduation.

On a scale from 0-10 (with 0= not at all, 5 = neutral, and 10 = Extremely Likely) would you recommend the MHA program to friend or acquaintance looking to advance their career:

  • 8.50/10 – would recommend.
  • 100% of students answered “yes” – if all things being equal, if you had to do it over again, would you choose to go to the MSUM MHA program.

Other Survey Results (alumni) using a 5-point Likert Scale:

  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with MHA program overall. (program goal 90%)
  • 94% stated the program was an extremely good or good investment. (1 student neutral)
  • 100% strongly agreed/agreed that they believed the curriculum prepared them as future leader.
  • 100% strongly agreed/agreed that they believe the program prepared them to critically think and approach problems allowing you to function as a future leader. (program goal 90%)
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with their program of study.
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with faculty’s respect for diversity, equity, and inclusion of students.
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with faculty’s responsiveness to student needs.
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with faculty’s ability to relate concepts to the real world.
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with MHA program coordinator and faculty support. (program goal 80%)
  • 100% were very satisfied/satisfied with timeliness of responses to student issues/concerns. (program goal 90%)

Qualitative Alumni Comments:

“The MHA program faculty’s dedication to the success of the students is evident along every step of the way. They work hard to ensure students have what they need to be successful.”

Information from Fall 2024 and Spring 2025 Current Student Program Survey n(20):
*Total enrollment in MHA program for Spring 2025 was 46 students

Where are current students working?

  • Hospital or Health System – 25%
  • Long Term Care Facility – 15%
  • Physician Practice – 10%
  • Governmental Agencies (e.g., local, state & federal agencies) – 10%
  • Federally Qualified Health Center– 10%
  • Insurance/MHO – 5%
  • Information Technology/Analytics – 5%
  • Military Health System or Veterans Health Administration – 5%
  • Consulting – 5%
  • Employed outside of healthcare – 5%
  • Wellness Services – 5%

Type of positions that our current students hold:

  • Other Executive Management – 5% (e.g., Vice President, Senior V.P., Executive Vice President, Associate Vice President, Other Executive Management, etc.).
  • Management Staff – 50% (e.g., Director, Manager, Unit Administrator, Practice Manager, Supervisor, etc.).
  • Administrative Staff – 30% (e.g., Senior Analyst, Senior Consultant, Financial Officer, Information Officer, Analyst, Consultant, etc.)
  • Clinical Staff – 10% (e.g., Registered Nurse, Pharmacist, Physical Therapist, Radiology Technician, Lab Technician, etc.)
  • Self Employed – 5%

Experience working for current students:

  • Years of experience
    • Mean experience: 7.15 years
    • Experience range: 1-24 years

Characteristics of the current students in the program:

  • Gender:
    • 75% Female
    • 25% male
  • Age:
    • Mean age: 31.2
    • Age ranges: 21-57
  • Race:
    • 10% - American Indian or Alaska Native
    • 5% - Asian
    • 10% - Black or African American
    • 75% - White
  • Ethnicity
    • 10% - Hispanic or Latino
    • 90% - Not Hispanic or Latino

Other Survey Results (current) using a 5-point Likert Scale:

  • 100% rated very satisfied or satisfied with the overall MHA program. (program goal 90%)
  • 95% rated very satisfied or satisfied with the commitment to academic excellence at MSUM in the MHA program. (program goal 90%)
  • 100% rated very satisfied or satisfied with overall support, service and concern provided by the MHA Program Director. (program goal 90%)
  • 90% rated very satisfied or satisfied with interprofessional collaboration opportunities (working with other students.
  • 100% rated very satisfied or satisfied with timeliness of my concerns.
  • 90% rated very satisfied or satisfied with flexibility of course scheduling. (program goal 80%)
  • 90% rated very satisfied or satisfied with availability of options/courses within the MHA graduate program. (program goal 80%)
  • 90% rated very satisfied or satisfied with advising and program support. (program goal 80%)

Student Qualitative Comments:

  • Everyone is so helpful and understanding. I feel like everyone in the program is cheering me on!
  • I feel that every single professor cares about the students and what we are learning.
  • Overall, the MHA program is designed to accommodate individuals with family and job responsibilities, making it accessible and convenient for all.
  • It is a great program! Program director is clear and makes the objectives easy to understand!
  • The MHA program is wonderful! It is the best online, accredited MHA program out there!
  • The MHA program at MSUM has provided me with great learning opportunities that have made me a better leader in healthcare. I feel confident I will be able to use the skills and tools I've learned to excel in my career. - Jen Sundboom
  • This program takes leadership roles to the level. – Rosie Eiden
  • The MHA program has provided me with an opportunity to work and advance in my career while also being fully engaged in a graduate program. The flexibility and support from the program instructors is incredibly and offers even more support while working through classes and having a career. - Seth Adkins
  • This is a wonderful program, and I am happy to be a part of it.
  • The MHA program has given me the skills to grow personally and professionally. I have noticed a significant amount of change with how I approach work since starting this program. I cannot wait to see where these skills continue to take me in my life. These professors are truly interested in the success of their students and in the improvement of the field of healthcare.
  • All the courses I've taken so far have been carefully and thoughtfully well-designed and implemented. Although a lot of work, they are objective focused, and each assignment has a purpose.
  • I have really enjoyed my time in this program so far. All the faculty seem knowledgeable about the topics they teach on. I like how easy it is to navigate the online platform.
  • All the faculty and graduate staff have been very supportive. Their vast experience compliments the MHA program offering insight and perspective to students
  • I LOVE this program!! I have learned a lot and I am so thankful to be part of this program.
  • I am very impresses with how accessible user friendly the programs are to use in the online format. The pacing of the program is not overwhelming for someone working a fulltime position, and the faculty is very accessible. I needed assistance from a professor, and he responded right back on a Sunday!
  • I really enjoy that the professors have personal experiences working in the field. I really appreciate the support from the faculty and feel that each of them is a genuine supporter of the students.
  • I enjoy how concepts flow into the "real world" work I currently do, and that the program is teaching me about all the skills and knowledge I need to have to increase my knowledge as a professional in the healthcare field.
  • The MHA courses are very well organized and apply to my overall career goals as a healthcare leader.
  • Such a wonderful program. The professors taught for success!
  • Courses are always well connected to learning outcomes, and it's really interest
  • Great program with exceptional guidance with real world experience. (Marketing Quote- Anonymous)
  • So far, the flexibility and texts have been great!

End of Course Aggregate Survey Results – From All MHA Courses Taught in that Term
*Our program goal is a mean of 4.0 or higher for each category

Surveyed
Spring 2025
Fall 2024
Spring 2024
Fall 2023
Spring 2023
Spring 2022
Fall 2021
Spring 2021
Fall 2020
Spring 2020
Surveyed
The course content provided relevant and useful knowledge
Spring 2025
4.62/5
(n 42)
Fall 2024
4.57/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.66/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.82/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.67/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.26/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.52/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.46
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.49
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.61/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The learning activities supported the learning objectives
Spring 2025
4.74/5
(n 42)
Fall 2024
4.77/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.66/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.86/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.75/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.29/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.57/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.40
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.49
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.57/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The course provided multiple activities that help students develop critical thinking and problem solving
Spring 2025
4.63/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.68/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.60/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.88/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.73/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.29/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.51/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.29
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.51
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.52/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
I achieved the course outcomes (goals) for the course (listed on the course syllabus).
Spring 2025
4.67/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.58/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.60/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.84/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.77/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.26/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.46/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.34
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.66
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.65/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
I achieved the program domains and competencies for this course (listed on the course syllabus)
Spring 2025
4.67/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.74/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.60/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.84/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.79/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.31/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.48/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.34
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.69
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.65/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
I can apply what I learned in this course to my work, professional activities and/or research
Spring 2025
4.62/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.74/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.66/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.88/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.69/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.33/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.62/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.34
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.61
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.57/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty provided clear expectations of course requirements
Spring 2025
4.70/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.69/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.57/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.82/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.75/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.19/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.55/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.49
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.61
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.48/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty showed commitment to learning and student progress
Spring 2025
4.77/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.83/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.57/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.84/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.88/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.33/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.6/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.47
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.67
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.61/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty communicated ideas and information clearly and effectively
Spring 2025
4.67/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.76/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.57/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.84/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.77/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.10/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.59/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.29
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.63
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.52/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty connected activities, assignments, and assessments to the course objectives.
Spring 2025
4.70/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.80/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.69/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.88/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.86/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.40/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.61/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.43
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.72
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.57/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty provided clear, useful, and timely feedback.
Spring 2025
4.70/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.85/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.54/5
(n 35)
Fall 2023
4.82/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.87/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.17/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.54/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.31
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.61
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.70/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
The faculty was inclusive to all students (new question sp 2023)
Spring 2025
4.74/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.85/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.79/5
(n 24)
Fall 2023
4.84/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.87/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
Fall 2021
Spring 2021
Fall 2020
Spring 2020
Surveyed
How would you rate this course faculty’s respect and concern for students?
Spring 2025
4.74/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.78/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.79/5
(n 24)
Fall 2023
4.86/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.81/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.48/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.63/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.54
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.66
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.78/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
How would rate this course faculty’s teaching performance?
Spring 2025
4.65/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.71/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.67/5
(n 24)
Fall 2023
4.74/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.67/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.12/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.51/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.43
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.57
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.48/5
(n 23)
Surveyed
How would you rate this course faculty’s knowledge of the subject matter?
Spring 2025
4.79/5
(n 43)
Fall 2024
4.81/5
(n 60)
Spring 2024
4.79/5
(n 24)
Fall 2023
4.80/5
(n 50)
Spring 2023
4.73/5
(n 52)
Spring 2022
4.48/5
(n 42)
Fall 2021
4.67/5
(n 67)
Spring 2021
4.66
(n 35)
Fall 2020
4.67
(n 67)
Spring 2020
4.43/5
(n 23)